Washington does not use a 24 hour notice to enter. Under RCW 59.18.150, an owner must give the tenant at least 2 days' written notice before entering to inspect, make repairs or improvements, or supply services, and at least 1 day's written notice to show the unit to prospective tenants or purchasers.
The notice must state the exact time of entry, or a window with earliest and latest times, plus a phone number the tenant can call to object or reschedule.
Search "24 hour notice to enter" and you will find plenty of templates and articles. Most of them describe other states. Oregon, California, and many others use 24 hours as the default entry notice, so the number sticks in people's heads.
Washington is different. RCW 59.18.150(6) requires at least 2 days' written notice of intent to enter for the general purposes the statute allows: inspecting the premises, making necessary or agreed repairs, alterations, or improvements, or supplying necessary or agreed services. The statute permits a shorter period, at least 1 day's notice, for one purpose only: exhibiting the unit to prospective or actual purchasers or tenants.
Entry must also happen at reasonable times. And outside the purposes the statute lists, an owner has no right of access at all except by court order, through an arbitrator, or with the tenant's consent.
An owner who serves a 24 hour notice borrowed from another state has served a defective notice in Washington. This is not a technicality. The statute attaches real penalties to repeat violations, which we cover below.
RCW 59.18.150(6) is specific about the contents of the notice, not just the timing. A compliant written notice of entry must include:
Beyond the statutory minimums, a well-drafted notice also states the purpose of the entry (inspection, repair, showing), the property address and unit, the date the notice was served, who will be entering (you, your manager, a contractor), and your name and signature.
Those extra elements are good practice rather than statutory requirements, but they make the notice harder to dispute and easier to document.
Serve it in writing, date it, and keep a copy. The 2 days run from the notice, so build in time for delivery, not just for drafting.
RCW 59.18.150(5) allows an owner to enter without the tenant's consent in exactly two situations: emergency and abandonment. A burst pipe flooding the unit below is an emergency. A tenant who has moved out and surrendered the unit has abandoned it. A hunch that something might be wrong is neither.
Subsection (6) also relaxes the written notice requirement when an emergency exists or when giving notice is impracticable, but those are narrow exceptions, not workarounds. If you can give 2 days' notice, give it.
The statute separately addresses fire officials and code enforcement officers, who can seek search warrants to inspect a unit or common areas when consent is refused. That process belongs to government officials, not to owners.
For everyone else, subsection (7) is blunt: outside the statute's listed purposes, there is no right of access except by court order, arbitrator, or the tenant's consent.
Entry rights in Washington run both ways, and RCW 59.18.150 imposes duties on each side.
The tenant's side. Under subsection (1), a tenant may not unreasonably withhold consent for the owner to enter for the permitted purposes: inspection, necessary or agreed repairs, alterations, improvements, services, or exhibiting the unit to prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, tenants, workers, or contractors. Asking to move a Tuesday inspection to Thursday is reasonable. Refusing every proposed date for a month, or refusing all access for a needed repair, starts to look unreasonable.
The owner's side. Under subsection (6), the owner may not abuse the right of access or use it to harass the tenant, must enter only at reasonable times, and may not unreasonably interfere with the tenant's enjoyment of the unit by excessively exhibiting it. Showing an occupied unit twice a week for three months invites a complaint; a focused showing schedule in the final weeks does not.
The remedy, for both parties. Subsection (8) gives each side the same enforcement tool. After one party serves the other with a written notification alleging good-faith violations of the section, listing the date and time of each violation, the violating party is liable for up to $100 for each violation that occurs after receipt of that notice. The prevailing party can also recover costs and reasonable attorney fees.
So an owner facing a tenant who keeps blocking lawful entries has a statutory remedy, and a tenant facing an owner who keeps entering improperly has the identical one.
The same two numbers govern almost every entry, but the details shift by purpose. Here is how the rules apply in practice. For what to actually look at once you are inside, see our full guide to rental property inspections in Washington.
An inspection is a core permitted purpose, so the standard rule applies: at least 2 days' written notice, an exact time or a stated window with earliest and latest times, and a phone number. Annual inspections are predictable, so there is no reason to cut the timing close. Send the notice a week out, offer a window, and invite the tenant to call if it conflicts.
Necessary or agreed repairs also take 2 days' written notice, unless a genuine emergency makes notice impracticable. A failed water heater that is actively leaking may justify immediate entry; a failed water heater that is simply cold justifies a fast, properly noticed visit. When a tenant reports the problem and asks you to come, that is consent, but a written confirmation of the agreed time still protects both sides.
This is the one place Washington allows 1 day's notice: exhibiting the unit to prospective or actual purchasers or tenants. The tenant still may not unreasonably withhold consent to a properly noticed showing. The counterweight is the excessive-exhibition rule; you cannot turn the last two months of a tenancy into a nonstop open house.
The statute lists mortgagees among the parties an owner may admit, so appraisals and lender or insurance inspections are permitted purposes. But the 1 day shortcut applies only to showings for prospective purchasers or tenants. An appraiser or insurance inspector gets the standard 2 days' written notice.
Workers and contractors are likewise on the statute's list of permitted entrants, and the 2 day rule applies. If a project needs multiple days of access, the notice can state a period of entry across specified dates with the earliest and latest times each day. For long projects, agree on a schedule with the tenant in writing rather than papering every visit separately.
RCW 59.18.150 requires "written notice" but does not say how it must be delivered or whether electronic messages qualify. We are not aware of clear authority settling the question for entry notices, so do not assume a text message will hold up if challenged.
State in the lease how notices may be served, including whether email or text counts as written notice for entry, and then keep proof of every notice you send. A dated PDF emailed to the address the lease designates, with the sent message retained, is far easier to defend than a text thread.
Our guide to rental property documentation covers how to keep this paper trail organized.
We never just drop by. Washington law requires proper written notice before entering an occupied home for an inspection, a repair, or a showing, and we treat that floor as the start, not the goal. Every entry is scheduled, confirmed in writing, and logged, even when a resident says "come anytime."
For a single home or condo, we ask first. A formal notice can feel like a demand, so we try to arrange access by agreement before we ever serve one. What that looks like:
That discipline protects you. A documented, noticed, scheduled entry is what defeats a tenant claim later, and the respect behind it is exactly why residents cooperate when you need access.
Proper notice is not a hurdle. It is how we keep your access clean and your liability low.
Related Sagareus Services: